GigaCapacity
Free tool
Which data center markets fit a buyer's power, fiber, incentive, and timeline needs?
Updated June 14, 2026

Market scorecard

Market Shortlist / Available Power Scorecard

Use this scorecard to compare markets by available power fit, time-to-power, fiber/interconnection, incentives, latency, permitting, and concentration risk.

The output creates a buyer-specific shortlist because each buyer weights speed, power risk, network path, and tax value differently.

How to use this calculator

Use before requesting site availability, utility service studies, or market tours for AI capacity.

  1. 01

    Enter the buyer scenario

    Start with the editable market scorecard inputs and replace defaults with current quotes, tariffs, engineering values, or buyer assumptions.

  2. 02

    Review the modeled outcome

    Use the modeled outcome, decision checks, and copied brief to compare the scenario against buyer constraints.

  3. 03

    Verify the result before acting

    Check the caveats, source table, and related guides before treating the output as a quote, bid, or final site decision.

Calculator inputs

Scenario defaults are editable. Replace them with current quotes, utility tariffs, tax counsel inputs, or engineering values before relying on the output.

Strong shortlist

Modeled outcome

Use the ranked candidate list to prioritize utility calls, site control checks, and fiber diligence; do not treat it as proof of live market availability.

Score

82 pts

Power score

39 pts

Timeline score

18 pts

Fiber score

8 pts

Incentive score

3 pts

Top candidate market

North Texas

Decision checks

  • Top candidate: North Texas (82 pts)
  • Shortlist: North Texas, Western Pennsylvania, Central Illinois
  • Watchlist: Northern Virginia

Market fit table

North Texas82 ptsPriority shortlist
Western Pennsylvania64 ptsShortlist with conditions
Central Illinois62 ptsShortlist with conditions
Northern Virginia45 ptsWatchlist

Provider questions

  • Which shortlisted sites have committed power versus capacity that depends on utility upgrades?
  • What make-ready work, deposits, or long-lead equipment control the stated delivery date?
  • Which fiber routes are physically diverse, and which cloud or carrier handoffs are already available?
  • What assumptions would move the proposal from shortlisted to unavailable or materially delayed?

Evidence to request

  • Utility service letter or study showing deliverable MW, upgrade scope, and energization schedule.
  • Site-control status, zoning or entitlement path, and expansion land constraints for each shortlisted site.
  • Carrier list, route diversity evidence, cloud on-ramp options, and cross-connect lead times.
  • Incentive eligibility memo showing investment, job, wage, power, and reporting requirements.

Risk flags

  • Northern Virginia remains a watchlist market because the buyer selected constrained-market penalties.

How does the market scorecard model work?

The scorecard evaluates a selected candidate market set against buyer needs across power scale, timeline, fiber and interconnection depth, incentive relevance, latency tolerance, permitting friction, renewable coverage, and concentration risk. It uses buyer inputs to produce a ranked fit tier and diligence checklist. The score prioritizes utility conversations and site diligence while leaving live availability and provider capability for direct verification.

What should buyers verify before using the result?

  • The scorecard does not claim live capacity availability; buyers must verify utility service, land control, and provider inventory.
  • Incentives can be outweighed by delayed power, grid upgrade cost, or permitting constraints.
  • Latency and fiber fit depend on actual routes, carriers, cloud on-ramps, and cross-connect economics.

Related guides and tools

Which sources support this market scorecard model?

SourceUse in this toolLink
CBRE North America Data Center Trends H2 2025Market supply, vacancy, and leasing pressure across North America.Open
CBRE North America Data Center Trends H1 2025Market supply, vacancy, demand, power, and density context.Open
JLL 2026 Market Outlook for Global Data CentersGlobal market outlook, cost, site selection, and power context.Open
Flexential data center site selection considerationsSite selection factors across power, connectivity, latency, and resilience.Open
Bloom Energy data center site selection and powerPower-first site selection framing for large data center development.Open
NCSL state data center incentive snapshotState-by-state incentive trend and eligibility context.Open
FCC National Broadband MapPublic broadband availability reference for site diligence.Open
U.S. EIA Electric Power MonthlyElectricity price and sales context for power cost assumptions.Open

FAQ: Which data center markets fit a buyer's power, fiber, incentive, and timeline needs?

Available power, time-to-power, high-density cooling readiness, fiber depth, expansion land, permitting path, utility risk, incentives, and latency all matter.

Not automatically. A smaller incentive in a faster, lower-risk power market can produce a better business outcome than a larger incentive with delayed energization.

No. It structures the shortlist and diligence questions. Live availability must be verified with providers, utilities, and site owners.